I am not qualified to write this post.
And yet, as the mother of two sons that I want to keep confident, safe, and above all happy, who is better qualified?
I visited the UK with Boy #1 last weekend. We had a helter-skelter trip, rushing here there and everywhere, with very few moments of calm apart from some time in a hire car whilst I drove the two of us to visit friends a couple of hours out of London.
We listened to the radio, and unless you are living in splendid isolation with no connection to media of any kind, you will not be surprised to learn that in amongst the music, the news updates on every single station were mainly concerned with the recent unearthing of Jimmy Saville's activities.
This is current news - this is dreadful, awful, stomach churning, disgraceful and current news - so why shouldn't it be reported, even on Radio One?
I can't write here, or indeed anywhere, of the horror I feel on behalf of the children who suffered at the hands of those who exploited them, other than to say that I hope their stories - and their bravery in coming forward to face their persecutors - are not lost in the maelstrom of accusation and counter-accusation on how the stories have been reported.
Instead, this post is about is how I dealt with a question from the back seat of the car as we drove around the M25 on Saturday morning.
"
What's 'child abuse', Mum?"
Surely a question that you hope never to hear from your child. And yet, almost above all other questions, the one that deserves to be answered. And answered in such a way that your child is left with a clear understanding of the boundaries, what constitutes crossing them, how it is never - NEVER - OK for that to happen, and what to do if it does.
So rather than ducking the question, changing the subject, switching the channel, we spoke about it.
I told Boy #1 that child abuse is when a grown-up treats a child in a way in which they should never be treated. Once we had got past his obvious rejoinder of "
What, you mean when a grown-up bosses a child about and tells them what to do?" I explained how it meant an invasion of personal space (I was slightly more explicit than that but I'm not going to go into detail here since - as
I've mentioned before - there are some unpleasant people out there who's google searches I do
not want The Potty Diaries to appear on), that being told to invade other people's personal space could be just as bad, and that should either of those things happen - or even be hinted at - he must tell his father or I immediately.
We spoke about it in a no-nonsense, matter of fact, non-gratuitous and calm way. There were no hysterics, no embarrassed silences. Boy #1 took the information on board, filed it away, and we moved on to talking about something else.
Since that time, I have also spoken to Boy #2 in the same way, and watched him similarly file the information away and move seamlessly on to which piece was missing from the lego kit in front of him on the kitchen table.
Do I wish we had never had to have those conversations? Of course. Am I sorry that we did? Absolutely not. I don't feel that the information I have given them has compromised my sons' innocence or their future memories of childhood simply by the fact of their possessing it. On the contrary; I feel I have helped both boys to protect those very things. I strongly believe that those who prey on children rely on those same children's parents never having had this conversation with them, and indeed that they rely on both parents and children not having the ability - the words - to do so. I also believe that a happy, confident child who is fully aware of what is Not OK - and that they can talk to their parents about it should they encounter such a thing - is less likely to fall prey to predators.
There is no fail-safe system, I know that. I can't wrap my children up in bubble-wrap and protect them, much as I may want to. But I can give them the tools to manage in today's world. I can give them the words.